Connect with us


Spain Slips into Recession as GDP Tumbles 18.5% in Q2, Italy, France Economies Battered as GDPs Shrink Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

Spain, Italy and France economies have been battered badly due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as the lockdown closed several factories, restaurants and shops.



Spain Slips

Spain/Italy, July 31: Spain, Italy and France economies have been battered badly due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as the lockdown closed several factories, restaurants and shops.  Spain plunged into recession in the second after its gross domestic product tumbled by 18.5 percent due to the coronavirus pandemic, official figures showed on Friday. According to reports, Spain’s economy suffered a bigger than expected blow in the second quarter.

According to a Bloomberg report, the drop in output has been led by plunges in consumer spending and investment — is the deepest reported so far in Europe.  Economists had predicted a 16.6 percent contraction in the economy. Spanish Minister Pedro Sánchez will reportedly be meeting later today with the leaders of Spain to discuss on a recovery strategy. Recession Meaning And FAQs: Are Some Countries in Recession? Know All About the Term And History From Around the World.

Similarly, Italy’s economy shrank 12.4 percent in the second quarter from the previous three months, preliminary data showed on Friday, as activity nosedived during the coronavirus pandemic, but the fall was less severe than many analysts had predicted.

Italy GDP Plunges 12.4%

#BREAKING Italy’s GDP plunges 12.4% in second quarter: official

— AFP news agency (@AFP) July 31, 2020

France’s economy shrank by nearly 14 per cent in the second quarter when the country was in coronavirus lockdown, a third consecutive quarter of negative growth in a worsening recession, the national statistics agency said Friday.

(The above story first appeared on Onhike on Jul 31, 2020 02:53 PM IST. For more news and updates on politics, world, sports, entertainment and lifestyle, log on to our website

Charles recently joined the team, and he writes for the Headline column of the website. He has done major in English, and a having a diploma in Journalism. He has worked for more than 1.5 years in a media house. Now, he joined our team as a contributor for covering the latest US headlines. He is smart both by him looks and nature. He is very good with everyone in the team.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


many as 75 percent support the Covid plan, including clear majorities of Republicans. This suggests that the unanimous opposition to the plan by Congressional Republicans



he Senate just passed the $1.9 trillion Covid relief bill—one of the biggest emergency spending packages in history, targeted to the poor and the middle class. But despite full Democratic control of Congress and the White House, it came with significant omissions from the wish list of Democratic priorities: no $15 minimum wage, lower jobless benefits, a tighter income limit for the checks. With just 50 senators and no Republicans crossing the line, President Joe Biden and his party had to bow to their most conservative members. 

You can almost hear the lamentations on the left: “If only we’d had another vote or two in the Senate, Biden and Chuck Schumer wouldn’t have had to cut $100 a week from the unemployment benefit to get Joe Manchin’s vote. And then we could keep going: ditch the legislative filibuster, pass that bill to stop voter suppression in the red states …”

And politically, there’s the worry that in two years, that slim majority will have much bigger consequences: The Democrats will take a beating at the polls for being unable to deliver the full package that most of the caucus, and the White House, wanted.

Before you join the chorus, you might want to check in with the last two Democratic presidents. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama both landed in office with much bigger majorities, and ended up taking it on the chin anyway. Despite the narrowest of majorities to get anything done, Biden, in , may be in a much better position.

When Clinton came to power in 1993, he had wide majorities in both houses: 57 Democrats in the Senate, and 258 Democrats in the House. But the resistance to his key economic package was so intense within his own party that his plan passed by just a single vote in both the House and the Senate, and only after important elements of that plan—like a gasoline tax—were thrown over the side to win the votes of suburban Democrats.

When Obama was inaugurated in 2009, Democrats and their independent allies held 59 seats in the Senate, and when Al Franken finally claimed his seat months later, they had a supermajority of 60—enough to overcome a filibuster. But in order to hold those votes, the Obama Administration had to keep the cost of its Great Recession stimulus package under $1 trillion—an amount, his team later conceded, was too small to trigger a robust recovery. Similarly, in order to get reluctant Democrats like Joe Lieberman to vote for the Affordable Care Act, the White House had to kill the public health-insurance option, which left progressive Democrats disheartened. (As Obama accounts in his memoir, “A Promised Land,” the handwringing from members of his own party took much of the shine off his signature achievement as president, the biggest expansion of health care since Medicare.)×2300-161962847/×2300-161962847/

The two ex-presidents also share a common, painful experience with the consequences of their battles. Clinton’s tax and budget initiatives were aimed at reducing the then-unacceptable budget deficit of some $250 billion—a deficit that helped propel independent candidate Ross Perot to 19 percent of the vote in 1992. (I hope you realize we’ve become Eisenhower Republicans, Clinton groused to his staff.) The policy ultimately worked—Washington was running a huge surplus by the end of the Clinton years—but in the short term it was a political liability, leading to the loss of both houses of Congress in 1994.

For Obama, the slow pace of the recovery and the Republicans’ relentless political attacks on Obamacare led to massive midterm losses in 2010 at every level. The House turned Republican, the Democrats lost their filibuster-proof majority in the Senate and 18 state legislatures turned red—a political upheaval that is still tormenting Democrats as they watch those legislatures push through voter suppression laws that will shape American elections for years to come.

But this time, Democrats may be able to provide a more upbeat answer to a question the approach of Passover inspires: “Why is this one-vote victory different from the other one-vote victories?”

This time, the benefits to tens of millions of Americans will be clear: $1,400 in bank accounts; extended jobless benefits; expanded childcare help. Donald Trump understood the impact of such assistance when he insisted his name be on the checks sent to American households. Joe Biden won’t be as blatant, but the direct aid will be a sharp contrast to what happened under Obama’s stimulus, when most Americans didn’t even realize they were getting a tax cut. It’s a sharp departure as well from the impact of Obamacare, where the benefits did not begin until long after the bill was passed, and after the midterm elections as well.

And this time, the bill that was passed was backed by enormous majorities of the citizenry—polls suggest that as many as 75 percent support the Covid plan, including clear majorities of Republicans. This suggests that the unanimous opposition to the plan by Congressional Republicans may leave the party with a political posture at a polar extreme from where they were in 1994 and 2009. The GOP was able to (inaccurately) pin Clinton with the “largest tax increase in history”; they were able to characterize the Obama stimulus and the Affordable Care Act as a giveaway to “those people.” But if the polls are right, Republican efforts to paint the Covid relief as a “blue state bailout” or a “Pelosi payoff” aren’t working.

Sen. Joe Manchin speaks to media at U.S. Capitol, in Washington, D.C.
‘I have no idea what he’s doing’: Manchin perplexes with Covid aid power play
Senate poised to pass $1.9 trillion Covid aid bill
Capitol riot shaman’s TV interview irks judge
The Rise of the Biden Republicans
Biden’s Russia pipeline dilemma just got worse — and he has Ted Cruz to thank
More significant, if the impact of $1,400 payments, the vaccination assistance and the other elements of the plan are really felt back home—by voters, who notice the difference in their bank accounts and their health—it is actually conceivable that the line “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” could become something other than the punchline of a joke.

It is, of course, possible that all those proposals that fell by the wayside—the $15 minimum wage, higher income limits on the stimulus checks, bigger jobless benefit—will trigger so much grousing from progressives that Biden has trouble keeping his own side of the aisle in line. If they’re thinking about 2022, they should be careful how much complaining they do. With the slimmest possible of majorities, Biden managed to push through something whose potential political payoff his two Democratic predecessors would have envied.

Continue Reading


UFC 259 Live Stream: How to Watch Blachowicz vs. Adesanya Online free from anywhere




Błachowicz vs. Adesanya Live online, start time: How to Watch UFC 259 Stream Full Fight from anywhere

Amanda vs Nunes also defends in the UFC 259 live stream

At the 6 March Saturday 2021 almost in the midnight the UFC 259 Live Stream Main Event -Błachowicz vs. Adesanya live is going to start. Where the up first you have Amanda Nunes vs Megan Anderson for the featherweight title will occur with the main event also Petr Yav vs. Aljamain Sterling and Thiago Santos vs. Aleksandar Rakic fight is include.

In the prelims will start at 8.00 Pm ET ,fighter are ready to fight Song Yadong vs. Kyler Phillips and Dominick Cruz vs. Casey Kenney.

In the early prelims is going to start at 6:30 p.m. ET / 2:30 a.m. GST at the “Fight Island” in UFC Apex, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States. in this card Kennedy Nzechukwu vs. Carlos Ulberg,Sean Brady vs. Jake Matthews and Rogerio Bontorin vs. Kai Kara France will face off each other.

When is the UFC 259?

UFC 259 Live: Błachowicz vs. Adesanya is expected to take place on Saturday, March 6, 2021. The Main card will start on 10 pm ET.

Main card – 10 p.m. ET / 6 a.m. GST
Late Prelims – 8 p.m. ET 4 a.m. GST
Early Prelims – 6:30 p.m. ET / 2:30 a.m. GST

Venue: UFC APEX Center, Las Vegas, USA

Free stream: DAZN free trial (EU, details below)

Watch anywhere: Try ExpressVPN

US stream: $64.99 on ESPN+

UK stream: £25 BT Sport Monthly Pass

Watch : Stream 259

UFC 259 press conference live video stream

259 Preview

The main event is particularly exciting. The middleweight Israel Adesanya will challenge the light heavyweight titleholder Jan Blachowicz by moving up a weightclass to become the fifth-ever fighter to hold two UFC belts simultaneously. If “The Last Stylebender” comes out victorious in this classic display of striking versus grappling, he will join the elite group of fighters who hold the record of being a ‘Champ-Champ’. First achieved by Conor McGregor, the feat has also been achieved by Daniel Cormier, Amanda Nunes, and Henry Cejudo.

Israel Adesanya weighed in at 200.5 pounds at the UFC 259 weigh-ins, staying true to his word that he would not be cutting weight. Jan Blachowicz weighed-in at 205 pounds.

Updates and Resuts

In the co-main event of UFC 259, women’s bantamweight and featherweight champion Amanda Nunes will defend the latter title against Megan Anderson, who has been waiting for a long time to get her shot at the UFC gold. After an unfortunate cancellation of their UFC 256 match-up, the two women will finally lock-up this Saturday in the UFC 259 co-main event.

UFC 259 Live- How to Watch Blachowicz vs Adesanya Stream – Film Daily



When and where will UFC 259: Blachowicz vs Adesanya take place?

UFC 259 will take place at the UFC Apex facility in Las Vegas, Nevada on March 6, 2021. The main card will be streamed live on ESPN+ pay-per-view following prelims on ESPN and early prelims on ESPN+.

The early prelims will start at 6:00 PM ET followed by prelims at 8:00 PM ET. The star-studded main card will start at 10:00 PM ET.

How much does it cost to watch UFC 259: Blachowicz vs Adesanya?

UFC fans with ESPN+ subscription can catch the event live in the United States on their television and streaming devices. A subscription to ESPN+ costs $6 for a month and $60 for an entire year.

UFC 259: Petr Yan vs. Aljamain Sterling set, three title fights on tap


The Bigy MMA!! Three titlist will appear soon in the  UFC 259 tonight around 10 PM ET/7 PM PT, light heavyweight champion Jan Blachowicz will step into the octagon to defend his title from undefeated middleweight champion Israel Adesanya, who is moving up in weight class to challenge Blachowicz for the belt. Suffice to say, it’s a bout you’re going to want to watch live — and the only way to do that is by watching the UFC 259 live stream, which is being broadcast exclusively through ESPN+.

How to Watch UFC 259 Online in the U.S.

Unfortunately, there isn’t a free UFC 259 live stream for viewers this side of the pond (DAZN is offering it for free in Europe). ESPN+ has the exclusive broadcast rights to the event in the United States and it has teamed up with UFC President Dana White to make sure those who facilitate illegal broadcasts get their comeuppance. So, how much does it cost to watch UFC 259 online? It’s not cheap — the UFC 259 PPV is available to existing ESPN+ subscribers for $70.

Here’s how to watch UFC 259 online.

ESPN+ is offering a $40 discount on the UFC 259 PPV to new customers who sign up before the event starts at 10 PM ET/7 PM PT. Usually, after handing over $60 for an annual ESPN+ subscription, the UFC 259 PPV would usually set you back $70, but ESPN+ is bundling the two together for only $90. Seeing as it’s the exclusive broadcaster for UFC in 2021, it’s a must-have for fight fans who want to watch the tournament unfold over the course of the year.

UFC 259 Fight Card

Early Prelims (6 PM ET / 3 PM PT)

Tim Elliott vs. Jordan Espinosa
Kennedy Nzechukwu vs. Carlos Ulberg
Sean Brady vs. Jake Matthews
Lívia Renata Souza vs. Amanda Lemos
Uros Medic vs. Aalon Cruz
Mario Bautista vs. Trevin Jones

Prelims (8 PM ET / 5 PM PT)

Dominick Cruz vs. Casey Kenney
Song Yadong vs. Kyler Phillips
Joseph Benavidez vs. Askar Askarov
Rogerio Bontorin vs. Kai Kara-France

Main Event (10 PM ET / 7 PM PT)

Jan Błachowicz vs. Israel Adesanya
Amanda Nunes vs. Megan Anderson
Petr Yan vs. Aljamain Sterling
Islam Makhachev vs. Drew Dober
Thiago Santos vs. Aleksandar Rakic

What Time Is the UFC Fight Tonight? UFC 259 Schedule

MMA fans around the world are readying their popcorn for UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya, an action-packed event with 15 bouts across three fight cards happening tonight at the UFC Apex arena in Las Vegas, Nevada. Three championship belts are on the line here, making this a show that no fight-lover will want to miss. UFC 259 is a pay-per-view that will air exclusively via ESPN+; from the early prelims to the main card, here’s when it’s all scheduled to go down.

Watch on ESPN+

UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya is one of the largest MMA events in recent memory with 15 fights spread across three cards. The main card, which is the pay-per-view portion of the show, features five fights, three of which are contests for championship belts. Like any other UFC PPV, these fights will be broadcast only on the ESPN+ streaming platform and start at 10 PM ET. Preceding this will be the four-fight preliminary card which is slated for 8 PM ET, while the six early preliminary bouts begin two hours earlier at 6 PM ET.

PPV Stream

Championship fights are usually (although not always) reserved for pay-per-view events, and UFC 259 is serving up three of these high-stakes title contests on the main card tonight. The headliner is a light heavyweight matchup between champion Jan Blachowicz and undefeated middleweight champ Israel Adesanya, who moved up in weight to challenge for a second belt. Two-division champion Amanda Nunes will also be defending the women’s featherweight belt against Megan Anderson as the co-main event, while bantamweight champ Petr Yan will go up against Aljamain Sterling in the third and final title bout.

Whether you plan to only tune in for the main card pay-per-view or you’re going to binge-watch the entire event, you’ll at least need to sign up for ESPN+ to grab the UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya pay-per-view, which will air exclusively via this premium streaming platform starting at 10 p.m. ET tonight. The good news is that if you’re a new subscriber, this bundle offer lets you grab a year’s worth of ESPN+ along with the UFC 259 PPV — a combined $130 value — for just $90, saving you a cool 40 bucks.

UFC 259 PPV Price: How Much Will Blachowicz vs. Adesanya Cost?

Later today, the third major MMA event of the year will take place at the UFC Apex arena in Las Vegas, Nevada. UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya has a star-studded fight card featuring three championship bouts, and as a pay-per-view showing, you’ll need to sign up for ESPN+ now so you can stream all the action live. Here’s everything you need to know about the event, including the UFC 259 PPV price and how you can save some cash.

Watch on ESPN+

ESPN holds exclusive broadcasting rights to UFC pay-per-view events, which can be watched live only via ESPN+. This premium streaming platform is home to a myriad of sports content including all things UFC, and at just $6 per month or a cheaper $60 per year, it’s a must-have for fight fans. UFC PPV events normally cost $70, but in the run-up to these big fights, new subscribers can grab a year’s worth of ESPN+ along with the PPV package for just $90 — a cool $40 savings off of their combined price. If you already have ESPN+, however, you’ll have to pony up the regular $70 ticket price if you want to watch UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya live on Saturday.

How to watch UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya live

UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya is the third pay-per-view event of 2021 and it’s a big one. The headliner is a light heavyweight title bout between current champion Jan Blachowicz (27-8) and undefeated middleweight champion Israel Adesanya (20-0), who is moving up in weight class to challenge Blachowicz for the belt. If Adesanya clinches the victory here, he’ll hold belts in two divisions simultaneously. He’ll find a tough opponent in seasoned veteran Blachowicz, who, despite not boasting the same undefeated record as Adesanya, is entering this fight following a string of wins, the most recent victory being his title win at UFC 253 last September.

Also on the main card is a contest for the UFC Women’s Featherweight Championship. Amanda Nunes (20-4), who currently holds both the featherweight and bantamweight titles — one of few fighters to ever hold two belts simultaneously, and the first woman to do so — will be defending her belt against former Invicta FC featherweight champion Megan Anderson (11-4). The third title bout on the main card will see defending bantamweight champion Petr Yan (15-1) go toe-to-toe with number one-ranked UFC bantamweight fighter Aljamain Sterling (19-3).

There are 15 fights scheduled across the main, preliminary, and early preliminary fight cards, and if you want to catch all the action live, then now’s the time to sign up for ESPN+ so you can watch UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya online live on Saturday. If you’re a new subscriber, be sure to take advantage of the bundle offer that lets you score a year’s worth of ESPN+ along with the UFC 259 pay-per-view bundle for just $90 (a $40 discount).

UFC 259 Fight Card: Who’s Entering the Octagon

With 30 combatants entering the Octagon and three championship bouts on the main card, UFC 259: Adesanya vs. Blachowicz is an event you don’t want to miss. This pay-per-view, which airs Saturday starting at 6 PM ET, will be broadcast exclusively via ESPN+ (and you still have time to sign up and grab the PPV bundle if you haven’t already). The UFC 259 fight card features a star-studded roster of some of the top talents in the world of MMA. Read on to find out more about the champions, their challengers, and other top-ranked fighters who will be doing their ring walks at UFC 259.

How to Watch on ESPN+

There are three fight cards scheduled for UFC 259, the main event being a contest for the UFC Light Heavyweight Championship. Current champ Jan Blachowicz (27-8), who won the belt last September at UFC 253, will be defending his title for the first time against reigning middleweight champion Israel “The Last Stylebender” Adesanya. Adesanya boasts an undefeated record of 20-0 and has moved up a weight class for this fight to challenge Blachowicz for the light heavyweight championship. If the Stylebender wins, he’ll be one of few fighters to have held titles in two divisions simultaneously.

What Channel Is UFC on Tonight? Catch UFC 259 Live.

UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya is coming tonight, bringing with it three explosive championship bouts. The main card portion of the event is a pay-per-view, and with 15 fights in total scheduled across three cards, now’s the time to sign up for ESPN+ so you don’t miss any of the action. Whether you’re streaming on your smart TV, mobile device, gaming console, or even just your ’s web browser, here’s what you need to know about what channel the UFC is on tonight.

Watch Now

ESPN+ is the go-to place for UFC live streaming, and as the exclusive outlet for pay-per-view events like UFC 259, it’s a must-have for anybody who can’t get enough mixed martial arts action. Because ESPN holds exclusive broadcasting rights to UFC PPV fights, however, you won’t find UFC 259: Blachowicz vs. Adesanya, UFC 260: Miocic vs. Ngannou, and other such events on regular TV channels — or even on TV streaming platforms like Hulu or Fubo.

Thankfully, ESPN+ is quite cheap at $6 per month or $60 annually, and if you’re a new member, you can get a year’s worth of ESPN+ and the UFC 259 PPV package for $90 ($40 off). More good news is that ESPN+ works on pretty much any modern streaming platform, from smart TVs and streaming sticks to mobile devices and Xbox and PlayStation gaming consoles. Note that the entire UFC 259 live stream will be available on ESPN+, but only the main card — the pay-per-view portion of the event — is exclusive to this service.

The UFC 259 fight card is a pretty hot one with 15 fights in total and three high-stakes championship title contests slated for the main card. The main event will see light heavyweight champ Jan Blachowicz defend his belt against undefeated middleweight champion Israel Adesanya, who is moving up in weight class for this fight to challenge for a second title. If Adesanya clinches the victory here, he’ll be one of only a handful of combatants to hold belts in two divisions.

One of those two-division champions, Amanda Nunes, is also fighting at UFC 259. She’ll be defending her women’s featherweight belt against Megan Anderson as the co-main event. The third and final title bout on the main card has reigning champ Petr Yan going up against rising star Aljamain Sterling. This will be the first title defense for both Blachowicz and Yan, who won their titles in 2020. Nunes — widely considered to be the best female mixed martial artist in MMA history — has successfully defended her belts six times so far.

Related Articles:

MMA !! UFC 259 live stream free full fight from anywhere

Amanda vs Nunes also defends in the UFC 259 live stream

Click Here to Watch Now


As a pay-per-view event, you won’t be able to watch UFC 259 live on TV, but there’s still time to sign up for ESPN+ and grab the PPV package at a discount. If you already have ESPN+ then you’ll have to pay up for the regular ticket price, but you can still save some cash by upgrading to The Disney Bundle and enjoy ESPN+, Disney+, and basic Hulu for $13 per month (25% off).

How to Live Stream UFC Fights Online in 2021

Sports were initially slower to join the streaming revolution owing to stricter broadcasting restrictions, but a lot has changed over the past few years. Now, it’s easier than ever for sports lovers and fight fans to live stream UFC fights and more right on their computers, mobile devices, smart TVs, and gaming consoles. If you’re looking for the best way to watch UFC online, we’ve got you covered.

Other streaming platforms

If you’re shopping for a larger streaming package that includes ESPN, however, then you’ve got a few other options — just remember that without ESPN+, you’ll miss out on pay-per-view UFC live streams. All of these services work with the vast majority of modern streaming platforms, but always be sure to check and make sure that the one you want is compatible with your devices before signing up.


FuboTV is a relative newcomer that is quickly shaping up to be the number one streaming platform for sports fans (including those who want to live stream UFC fights). It offers two standard plans that both include ESPN: The Family plan, which offers 114 channels and rings in at $65 per month, and the $80-per-month Elite plan which features 159 channels along with some other extras.


Hulu might have the biggest name recognition when it comes to streaming TV shows and channels, so its place on this list should come as no surprise. Its $65/month Live TV plan includes ESPN and you can add premium channels like HBO, Showtime, Starz, and more to your plan a la carte. If you want ESPN+, then another great option is The Disney Bundle which gets you basic ad-supported Hulu (note that this is different than the full Hulu Live package), Disney+, and ESPN+ for just $13 per month.

Sling TV

Sling TV stands as a cost-effective alternative for streamers who don’t want to pay for a bunch of channels they’re never going to watch. Sling has two smaller plans – Orange and Blue — which you can get for $35 per month each. Only the Orange package has ESPN channels for things like UFC live streams, though, but you can combine the two into the Orange + Blue plan for only $50 per month. As with Hulu, premium channels are available at extra cost.

YouTube TV

YouTube TV, as you probably gleaned from the name, is YouTube’s foray into the world of premium streaming services. It costs $65 per month — the same as Hulu or Fubo — and includes ESPN, letting you live stream UFC content (aside from pay-per-views, which still require ESPN+). You get more than 85 channels out of the gate with premium add-ons available.

Related Articles

How to Watch UFC 259 Stream Full Fight from anywhere

Nunes vs. Anderson Live UFC 259 Stream

UFC 259 Live-How to watch Full fight, Time and Complete TV & Streaming Guide

Event: UFC 259: “Błachowicz vs. Adesanya”

Continue Reading


signature on what would be his first major legislative victory.



The Senate on Saturday narrowly passed President Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief plan following a marathon overnight session in a key vote that puts new stimulus checks and expanded unemployment checks one step closer to the pockets of the American public.

Following 27 hours of debate, delays and wrangling, Democrats pushed through the legislation in a party-line vote of 50-49. The legislation now heads back to the House for final approval before hitting Biden’s desk for his signature on what would be his first major legislative victory.

Democrats, who have the slimmest of majorities in the Senate, were united in passing the legislation that they say will help rescue the economy and end the coronavirus pandemic that has claimed more than 520,000 lives.–161965151/–161965841/–161966190/–161966217/

“The people are hurting, and today we respond,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said prior to the vote.

Republicans said the legislation is too big and bloated.

“The Senate has never spent $2 trillion in a more haphazard way or through a less rigorous process,” GOP Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said before the vote.

The vote capped a sleepless and drama-filled overnight session.

The Senate has been in session for 27 hours straight as Democrats have been trying to push the landmark legislation over the finish line despite objections from Republicans who dubbed the bill a liberal wish list that does little to directly spend money on coronavirus.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., was determined to “power through” Saturday to finish the bill that will deliver another round of $1,400 stimulus checks, extend $300-per-week unemployment benefits and offer more food, child care and rental assistance to struggling Americans.

Senate Continues Work On COVID-19 Relief Bill WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 05: U.S. Minority Whip Sen. John Thune (R-SD) (L) speaks as Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) listens during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 5, 2021 in Washington, DC. The Senate continues to debate the latest COVID-19 relief bill. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Senate Continues Work On COVID-19 Relief Bill WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 05: U.S. Minority Whip Sen. John Thune (R-SD) (L) speaks as Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) listens during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 5, 2021 in Washington, DC. The Senate continues to debate the latest COVID-19 relief bill. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
“It has been a long day, a long night, a long year. But a new day has come,” Schumer said. “And we tell the American people, help is on the way.”

Schumer said the legislation delivers on the promise Democrats made to the American people in the 2020 election to rescue the country from the depths of the pandemic and economic downturn.

“This bill will deliver more help to more people than anything the federal government has done in decades,” Schumer said Saturday.

The road to passage has been marked by delays, long nights and a historic vote. The drama started on Thursday afternoon when Vice President Kamala Harris had to come to the rescue of Senate Democrats to cast a deciding 51st vote to open debate on the coronavirus relief bill.


But the debate on the bill was quickly scuttled by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who requested the entire 628-page legislation be read aloud by the Senate clerks in advance of any discussion on the merits of the proposal.

That meant Senate clerks spent the next 10 hours and 44 minutes reading the bill until 2:04 a.m. Friday.

Senators returned to work Friday morning to begin what is known as a “vote-a-rama” on a series of amendments to change the bill. But that effort was delayed by nearly 12 hours when Democrats needed to shore up votes for a key amendment on unemployment benefits.


Sanders was the first senator to offer an amendment to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. The effort failed to pass, but the vote was kept open for a record-breaking 11 hours and 50 minutes in a major tactic, as Democrats were scrambling to secure support from Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., on the unemployment benefit change.

That long negotiation involved the White House and left the Senate at a standstill until shortly before 11 p.m. Friday.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.
Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.
With Manchin’s support secure, Democrats overnight approved an amendment by a 50-49 vote to update the terms of expanded unemployment insurance. Benefits would be lowered to $300 a week, compared to the House version of $400. The would extend through Sept. 6 — a bit longer than the Aug. 29 expiration in the House-passed bill. The first $10,200 of the jobless benefits would also be tax-free to households with incomes under $150,000

But the long night showed on tired-eyed senators. Some who normally don’t wear glasses, like GOP Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, were spotted in spectacles on the Senate floor Saturday morning.


Some senators were resting their faces in their hands on the Senate floor, with one Democrat even appearing to doze off in the chamber. Some Republicans were spotted napping in the GOP cloakroom.

A couple of Republicans who walked into the Senate chamber afterward looked a bit disheveled as if they just woke up from a snooze.

Aside from rumpled hair, quite a few senators were seen loosening some of their ties and unbuttoning the top button of their shirts as the session wore on. Still, Republicans forged forward with offering a slew of amendments to try to curb spending and benefits in the bill — with little success.

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., worked through the night without sleep, according to a spokesperson, as he prepared to offer amendments to support the Keystone XL pipeline and cut spending from the bill, including about $175 million in transit projects from California, New York and elsewhere.


Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., also worked all night to secure a vote on his amendment to send the coronavirus bill back to committees. (It failed in a party-line 49-50 vote Saturday). He kept his staff fueled with Chick-fil-A for lunch on Friday and then started the Saturday stretch with bagels, according to his spokesperson.

Hagerty: More pork in COVID bill ‘than all the BBQ joints in Tennessee’Video
Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Penn., caught a few minutes of sleep between votes. Food options overnight were pizza, chips, candy and caffeine. (Toomey keeps a candy drawer stocked up in the Senate chamber). But Saturday morning brought the relief of Chik-fil-A breakfast sandwiches and more caffeine, according to his spokesperson.

Harris was not needed for the final passage on the legislation Saturday. That’s because Republicans were down one vote after Sen. Dan Sullivan had to leave to go home to Alaska for the funeral of his father-in-law.


The legislation now heads back to the House where a vote is scheduled for Tuesday. There’s been some concern from progressives there over changes the Senate made to remove the $15 minimum wage provision, to lower the weekly unemployment benefits from $400 to $300 and to limit the income eligibility for stimulus checks.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., can only afford to lose four votes and still send the bill to Biden’s desk for his first legislative win.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found this week that Biden’s coronavirus proposal would add $1.862 trillion to the national deficit over 10 years, with the bulk of the new spending — $1.173 trillion — occurring in the fiscal year 2021.

The federal government ran an annual deficit of $3.1 trillion in the 2020 fiscal year, more than triple the deficit of the previous year, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center. The cumulative national debt now sits at $28 trillion
The $1.9 trillion package passed by the Senate on Saturday largely resembled the one that President Biden proposed. But several notable changes would affect Americans’ personal finances.



Biden Says Stimulus Plan Will ‘Meet the Most Urgent Needs of the Nation’
President Biden celebrated the Senate’s passage of his $1.9 trillion pandemic relief plan on Saturday, saying it will bring urgent relief to struggling Americans and businesses, in addition to cutting child poverty by half.
Today, I can say we’ve taken one more giant step forward in delivering on that promise that help is on the way. I want to thank — start off by thanking — the vice president, but I want to thank all of the senators who worked so hard to reach a compromise to do the right thing for the American people during this crisis and voted to pass the American Rescue Plan. It obviously wasn’t easy, it wasn’t always pretty, but it was so desperately needed, urgently needed. This nation has suffered too much for much too long. And everything in this package is designed to relieve the suffering and to meet the most urgent needs of the nation and put us in a better position to prevail, starting with beating this virus and vaccinating the country. The resources in this plan will be used to expand and speed up manufacturing and distribution of vaccines. This plan will get checks out the door starting this month to the American people who so desperately need the help. This plan puts us on a path to beating the virus. This plan gives those families who are struggling the most the help and the breathing room they need to get through this moment. This plan gives small businesses in this country a fighting chance to survive. And one more thing — this plan is historic. Taken altogether, this plan is going to make it possible to cut child poverty in half. When I was elected, I said, “We’re going to get the government out of the business of battling on Twitter, and back in the business of delivering for the American people.” Of making a difference in their lives, giving everyone a chance, a fighting chance. Of showing the American people that their government can work for them. And passing the American Rescue Plan will do that.

President Biden celebrated the Senate’s passage of his $1.9 trillion pandemic relief plan on Saturday, saying it will bring urgent relief to struggling Americans and businesses, in addition to cutting child poverty by half.CreditCredit…Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times
Thomas Kaplan
By Thomas Kaplan
March 6, 2021
Updated 5:09 p.m. ET
WASHINGTON — The $1.9 trillion economic stimulus plan approved by the Senate on Saturday follows the outlines of the sweeping pandemic aid package that President Biden proposed, but senators made a series of notable changes that narrowed the bill.

While the House passed a version of the bill that largely kept Mr. Biden’s proposals intact, the Senate omitted an increase in the minimum wage that he had included, pared back eligibility for the next round of stimulus checks and limited how much Americans will receive in supplemental unemployment benefits in the coming months.

The changes made by the Senate are likely to stick, as the version passed by the chamber is scheduled to go before the House for its final approval on Tuesday. The bill would then head to Mr. Biden for his signature.

Here are some of the major between the two chambers’ .

The minimum wage increase was dropped.
The House bill would gradually raise the federal minimum wage, which is currently $7.25 per hour, to $15 per hour by 2025. The Senate bill does not incorporate a wage increase.


Continue reading the main story

The Senate parliamentarian said last month that the wage increase violated the strict rules governing what can be included in bills passed through a special process known as budget reconciliation — prompting Democrats to jettison it from the package.

Unlock more free articles.
Create an account or log in
Democrats used the reconciliation process because it allowed the bill to pass the Senate with only a simple majority, protecting it from a filibuster — which requires 60 votes to break — and thus eliminating the need to win support from Republicans.

On Friday, an amendment to add back the minimum wage increase fell well short of the 60 votes needed to do so, failing 42 to 58 in a procedural vote. Seven Democrats and one independent who caucuses with them joined all 50 Republicans in opposition, signaling that the wage increase lacked sufficient support to clear the Senate regardless of the parliamentarian’s ruling.

Stimulus checks will be available to fewer Americans
Both the House and Senate bills would provide another round of direct payments to Americans, with payments of up to $1,400 going to hundreds of millions of people. But the Senate bill places stricter income limits on who is eligible, disqualifying millions of people from receiving a payment.

Both bills would provide $1,400 payments for individuals earning up to $75,000, single parents earning up to $112,500 and married couples with incomes up to $150,000. Gradually smaller payments would go to those earning more, declining as income levels rise and phasing out altogether for those above a certain income cap.

Editors’ Picks

Speaking of Britney … What About All Those Other Women?

Seth Rogen Is All Fired Up

The Activists Working to Remake the Food System
Continue reading the main story

Continue reading the main story

But while the House set the cap at $100,000 for individuals, $150,000 for single parents and $200,000 for couples, the Senate lowered them to placate moderates who wanted the payments to be more targeted.

Biden’s Stimulus Plan
Frequently Asked Questions
March 6, 2021, 1:58 p.m. ET4 hours ago
4 hours ago
How big are the stimulus payments in the bill, and who is eligible?
How would the stimulus bill affect unemployment payments?
What would the bill do to help people with housing?
Is this helpful?

Instead, the Senate bill would set the cap at $80,000 for individuals, $120,000 for single parents and $160,000 for couples, meaning those earning more than that would not receive checks.

Unemployment payments would remain at $300 per week, instead of increasing to $400.
The last stimulus package passed in December partly restored a federal unemployment payment that lapsed last summer, offering $300 per week and extending it through March 14. The House bill increased the benefit in line with Mr. Biden’s proposal, but the Senate, where moderates balked at raising the payment, left it the same.

The House version would provide a more generous benefit of $400 per week through Aug. 29. The Senate measure would provide $300 per week through Sept. 6.

The Senate bill would also exempt $10,200 in unemployment benefits received in 2020 from federal income taxes for households making less than $150,000.

Both the House and Senate also sought to help workers who lost their jobs keep their employer-provided health insurance coverage, but the Senate bill is more generous. The House measure would cover 85 percent of premiums through a program called COBRA through September, while the Senate measure would cover the full cost of those premiums.

A rail project, student loan debt and more
The two bills differ in a variety of other areas. The Senate added a provision that would exempt student loan forgiveness from income taxes through 2025, a step that comes amid pressure on Mr. Biden to cancel student loan debt through executive action.


Continue reading the main story

Funding for a rail project in Silicon Valley in Northern California, which was criticized by Republicans, was included in the House bill but dropped from the Senate measure after the parliamentarian ruled against it.

Another transportation-related allotment in the House bill that drew criticism from Republicans, $1.5 million for the Seaway International Bridge between upstate New York and Canada, was dropped from the Senate version as well.

Continue Reading


Recent Posts