Connect with us


Crack Stream!! Watch NHL Regular Season Live Senators vs Canucks Online



 NHL Reddit Stream!! Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators live stream Free on Reddit watch online without cable

Welcome to the NHL 2021 season! It’s down to watch the NHL 2021 regular season game live stream between Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators. Congratulations to Boston Bruins at Pittsburgh Penguins on advancing to the regular season games in the NHL 2021. NHL Stream will make sure to have all the NHL in regular season games remain enjoyable. Stream all NHL regular season 2021 games live online directly from your desktop, tablet, mobile. We do our best to provide NHL live stream videos of the highest quality available around the web forecasting here.

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators finally got the best of the the NHL 2021 regular season and will have to visit field to take in the season matchup as well as we’ll get to see it’s live.

Watch Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators Live Stream Here


Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators

Wednesday, 27 Jnuary, 2021

8:00 PM ET

TV: Sportsnet

Rogers Arena

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators live stream

Watch anywhere: Try ExpressVPN risk-free today

Click Here To Watch Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators Live

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators were as dominant on offense as always against in the season and managed to put up points against one of the best defence in the NHL 2021. NHL 2021 season were throttled by itself earlier in the year and will be looking for retribution on its home turf.

The NHL 2021 season were subpar throwing the football but got a ton of help from the previous round performance. Three interceptions will always give you a chance to win a football game, and having two viable running backs available in the NHL have a well-rounded offense appeared during the regular season but doing it again in the playoffs on the road will be much more difficult.

How to watch NHL 2021 Regular Season from outside your country

If you’ve mismatched a holiday or you’re away on business and you want to watch your country’s coverage from abroad, then you’ll need to use a VPN. This will help you dial in to a location back in your home country to avoid geo-blocks and regain access to the content and services you already pay for back home.

A VPN is generally perfect for this as it allows you to change your IP address so you appear to be in a completely different location when the big game is on.

Use a VPN to live stream NHL Regular Season Game from anywhere

ExpressVPN – get the world’s best VPN

We’ve put all the major VPNs through their paces and we rate ExpressVPN as our top pick, thanks to its speed, ease of use and strong security features. It’s also compatible with just about any streaming device out there, including Amazon Fire TV Stick, Apple TV, Xbox and PlayStation, as well as Android and Apple mobiles.

Sign up for an annual plan now and get an extra 3 months absolutely FREE. And if you change your mind within the first 30 days, let them know and they’ll give you your money back without a quibble.

– Try ExpressVPN 100% risk-free for 30 days

Once you’ve chosen and installed your VPN of choice, simply open the service’s corresponding app, hit ‘choose location’, select the appropriate country, and you’ll be able to watch the broadcast as if you were back at home.

Today’s Schedule

Nashville Predators vs Chicago Blackhawks
Wednesday, 27 Jnuary, 2021
7:30 PM ET
Bridgestone Arena
Watch Live

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators
Wednesday, 27 Jnuary, 2021
8:00 PM ET
TV: Sportsnet
Rogers Arena
Watch Live

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators live stream NHL Regular Season game

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators live stream: how to watch NHL 2021 Regular season game FREE online in the US

Today’s Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators game is being shown on Sportsnet, with kick-off scheduled for 8.00pm ET at Rogers Arena.

If you’ve got Fox as part of your cable package, you can stream the NHL Game online via the Sportsnet website. If you haven’t, the cheapest option right now for many fans is over-the-top streaming service Sling TV.

Its Blue package, which includes Sportsnet in a number of major metro area markets, and also comes with NHL Network for good measure and is competitively priced at $30 a month – as well as offering a FREE 3-day Sling Blue trial that means you can essentially watch the Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators game online free, if that’s what you decide.

How to watch Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators FREE without cable

In general though, we recommend fuboTV as the best to watch NHL games without cable this season.

That’s because for complete coverage of all nationally televised NHL without cable, you need access to Fox, CBS, NBC, ESPN and NFL Network – and only fuboTV currently offers them all to the best of our knowledge.

Pricing starts from $64.99 a month, which is a darn sight cheaper than cable, and there’s even a FREE fuboTV trial you can take advantage of. That means you can watch today’s Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators game 100% free!

Don’t forget, you can take your favorite NHL streaming coverage with you wherever you are with the help of a good VPN – try the best around, ExpressVPN 100% risk-free for 30-days.

Not interested in signing up for cable or for a streaming service? Yahoo is showing every NHL game that’s being broadcast in your local TV market for free in its Yahoo Sports app, including the Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators NHL game today.

Free Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators live stream Canada

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators live stream: How to watch NHL game FREE in Canada

Today’s Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators NHL Game kicks off at 10.00 pm ET in Canada, and linear TV coverage is being provided by CTV and RDS.

When it comes to streaming though, Canadian NHL fans are some of the luckiest in the world, as DAZN includes coverage of every single 2021 season game.

That obviously means the Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators game is covered, and it’s an absolute steal as DAZN costs just CAD$20 a month or $150 a year – there’s even a free DAZN trial deal currently running that will get you access for nothing! Not only do you get every single NHL game, including NHL Game Pass and RedZone access, but DAZN’s also the exclusive Canadian streaming home of Premier League and Champions League soccer!

It comes with support for iOS, Android, Apple TV, Chromecast, Amazon Fire TV, Android TV, Roku, Xbox One, PS4, and laptop/PC streaming (including Mac devices).

Watch Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators live stream NHL Regular Season in UK

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators: live stream NHL in the UK and watch NHL 2021 regular season game online

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators being aired in the UK on Sky Sports, with coverage starting on Sky Sports NHL and Sky Sports Main Event at 7:00 pm ET kick-off.

If you don’t have Sky Sports as part of your TV package, it also offers a streaming-only service called Now TV, which lets you buy contract-free access to all the National Hockey League action.

Alternatively, you can tune in to the Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators. NHL Game via NHL  Network Pro from just £1.99 a week – or, for a flat fee of £50, get access through the end of July 2021, which will see you through the all game at NHL.

Not in the UK but still want to catch the action on the NHL streaming service you’ve signed up for? Grabbing a VPN will let you log into a UK IP address so you can live stream NHL as if you were at home.

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators live stream NHL 2021 Season in Australia

How to watch Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators: live stream NHL 2021 Season in Australia

If you live in Australia, you’re spoilt for choice as the Game is being covered by a number of Aussie outlets – kick-off being scheduled for 9.00pm ET on Tuesday Night.

100% FREE-TO-AIR channel 7Mate will be showing this game – so that’s obviously a great option for fans Down Under.

Even better, anyone located in Australia can also watch the channel absolutely free online. You just need to quickly create an account on its companion 7Plus streaming service and all that’s required is a name, verifiable email address, and Australia zip code.

It’s not the most elegant platform we’ve ever seen, but if you head there and click the ‘Live TV’ tab at kick-off time, the Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators game should be on. Its lack of future listings is particularly frustrating but, hey… free is free, right?

Not in Australia? Anyone out of the country at the moment will find that using a reliable VPN allows them to regain access to the 7Plus platform and other region-locked sites in Oz. We’ve tested this as of January 2021, and can confirm that the service is accessible – provided you quickly make an account as above.

The best way to watch NHL online in Australia

In general, Kayo Sports is our favourite streaming solution for cord-cutters Down Under – and it’s also offering a Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators live stream. It should be showing all the NHL games from now on, plus loads more sporting coverage from top-tier soccer (La Liga, Serie A, FA Cup) to US sports like the NBA and NHL.

The streaming service has a Basic and a Premium plan, with the difference being you can watch on two devices with the Basic plan for $25 per month and on three devices with the Premium plan for $35 per month.

The best news? Both plans come with a FREE 14-day trial, so if you’re looking just to watch a specific game or two you can cancel after the 14 days.

Plus, our latest testing reveals that Australian residents who’ve subscribed to Kayo can use the streaming service even if they’re abroad – our No.1 rated VPN offering 3-months FREE right now with an annual plan working brilliantly with the platform as of January 2021.

ESPN, available through Foxtel, is broadcasting the game too, and you can stream it to your laptop or mobile device using the Foxtel Go app, but you’ll need your Foxtel ID to access the app.

Alternatively, live-for-it NHL fans can sign up for an NHL Regular Season as it is also available in Australia, and even though it is marginally more expensive you have a much wider range of features.

Should I buy an NHL Game Pass?

Watching NHL online has never been easier thanks to the wide variety of streaming services now available. However, the league also has its own streaming service called the NHL Stream which allows die-hard Hockey fans to watch every game.

It’s really geared towards international fans and that’s where it’s a great option. In most of the NHL’s main international markets, a Game Pass Pro subscription will get you access to every single regular season and playoff game live and you also get the league’s live highlights show, RedZone. It costs £1.99 a week or £50 through July 2021 in the UK so if you’re a big fan who watches multiple games every week, it breaks down quite favourably.

As well as the UK and Ireland, the service is available in countries like Mexico, Germany and most of Europe, and Australia – with only ‘domestic markets’ the US and Canada missing out on the full-fat offering.

Instead, there’s a US and Canada-only Game Pass option available for $99 a a year that lets you watch commercial-free full game replays right after they’ve finished. Not the worst offer we’ve ever heard, but don’t get caught out – GamePass does not offer live NHL games in the US or Canada.

Should you decide to give Game Pass a shot, apps for Android and iOS mobile devices as well as on the likes of Chromecast, Apple TV, Roku, PS4, and more – plus you can obviously watch on your laptop or desktop computer through a browser.

The only caveat for non-domestic markets (e.g. the UK) are that some games are subject to blackout restrictions due to deals with local pay TV providers (e.g. Sky).

Sling TV provides access to every channel that carries NHL Season games. A three-day free trial is available.

To watch the NHL live on Sling TV: Get ExpressVPN. Connect to a server location in the United States, such as Los Angeles. For assistance, contact ExpressVPN Support via live chat. Go to Sling TV and sign up for Sling Orange and Blue. Tune in and enjoy!

Watching on a computer? For the best streaming experience, use the ExpressVPN browser extension for Chrome, Firefox, or Edge. Watching on mobile? Fire up the Sling TV app on Android and iOS.

Stream the NHL Regular Season live online on YouTube TV

Price: 65 USD/month

Channels: ABC, CBS, ESPN, Fox, and NBC

YouTube TV gives you all of the networks carrying the NHL, including the Season and offers a five-day free trial.

The available games will depend on your location. You may need to supply a valid U.S. postal code (e.g., 10012, 48104) and credit card.

To watch the NHL on YouTube TV: Get ExpressVPN. Connect to a server location in the United States, such as Chicago. For assistance, contact ExpressVPN Support via live chat. Go to YouTube TV and sign up. Kick back and enjoy!

Watching on a computer? For the best streaming experience, use the ExpressVPN browser extension for Chrome, Firefox, or Edge. Watching on mobile? Fire up the YouTube TV app on your Android or iOS device.

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators Live Stream 2021 NHL Regular Season on FUBOTV

Price: 65 USD/month

Channels: CBS, Fox, NBC, and NHL Network

How about another way to catch NHL games? Use the seven-day free trial on fuboTV to watch more football and other sports like MLB and the NFL!

To stream live NHL games with fuboTV: Get ExpressVPN. Connect to a server location in the United States, such as Chicago. For assistance, contact ExpressVPN Support via live chat. Sign up on fuboTV. Tune in and enjoy!

Watching on a computer? For the best streaming experience, use the ExpressVPN browser extension for Chrome, Firefox, or Edge. Watching on mobile? Fire up the fuboTV app on Android and iOS.

Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators Live stream the NHL Regular Season on Hulu + Live TV

Price: 65 USD/month and up

Channels: ABC, CBS, ESPN, Fox, and NBC

Hulu+Live TV is another way to catch live NHL games and offers a seven-day free trial available. Games shown are subject to regional availability and blackout restrictions. You may need to supply a valid U.S. postal code (e.g., 10012, 48104) and credit card.

To watch live NHL games with Hulu + Live TV: Get ExpressVPN. Connect to a server location in the United States, such as Chicago. For assistance, contact ExpressVPN Support via live chat. Go to Hulu and select a plan. Tune in to the action!

Watching on a computer? For the best streaming experience, use the Watching on mobile? Fire up the Hulu app on your Android or iOS device.

Watch Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators NHL Monday Ticket live on AT&T TV Now

Price: 55 USD/month and up

Channels: ABC, CBS, ESPN, Fox, and NBC

DirecTV’s NHL Tuesday Ticket gives you access to out-of-market NHL games (based on your service address) on ABC, Fox, and CBS.

Select international games are subject to blackouts. You will need to provide a valid U.S. address and credit card.

To watch NHL games on AT&T TV Now: Get ExpressVPN. Connect to a server location in the United States, such as San Francisco. For assistance, contact ExpressVPN Support via live chat. Go to AT&T TV Now and sign up. Enjoy the games!

Watching on a computer? For the best streaming experience, use the ExpressVPN browser extension for Chrome, Firefox, or Edge Watching on mobile? Fire up the AT&T TV Now app on your Android or iOS device.

Watch NHL replays and highlights on Pluto TV

Price: Free

Pluto TV and NHL partnered up and launched a new channel for watching NHL replays called the NHL Channel. There’s no need to sign up, and the content is available for free.

To watch NHL games on Pluto TV: Get ExpressVPN. Connect to a server location in the U.S. Go to Pluto TV. Enjoy watching!

Watching on a computer? For the best streaming experience, use the ExpressVPN browser extension for Chrome, Firefox, or Edge.

Watching on mobile? Fire up the Pluto TV app on your Android or iOS device.

NFL Blackouts: International Game Pass vs. U.S. Game Pass

What’s the difference between watching NFL SUPER BOWL in Germany, Australia, Canada, or the U.S.? NFL Game Pass is available both inside and outside the States. However, there are key differences every fan needs to know:

The U.S. NFL Game Pass does not offer live streaming of regular-season or postseason games. It provides streams of out-of-market preseason games, on-demand replays of every regular-season game, and the NFL Films archive. There are no blackouts of regular-season games (because none are shown live at all). A seven-day free trial is available.

In most other markets, such as Mexico and most EU countries, the international NFL Game Pass offers all 256 regular-season games plus the NFL Playoffs and Super Bowl. Users trying to watch the NFL in the UK or Ireland are subject to blackouts on some games, and for viewers who want to stream the NFL in Canada, Game Pass is available exclusively through DAZN.

Most international Game Pass subscribers get access to NFL RedZone, the NFL Network, and all NFL Films programming. There’s a seven-day free trial available.

Is NFL SUPER BOWL Game Pass UK the same as the international Game Pass?

In a word, no. Regional broadcasting rights in the UK and the Republic of Ireland mean certain games are subject to blackout restrictions. superbowl

This applies even if a subscriber from the UK or Ireland is in another part of the EU. Existing EU Portability Regulations require UK and Ireland blackout restrictions to apply no matter where in the EU the subscriber is.

Can I watch NFL SUPER BOWL Game Pass in Europe?

EU viewers who subscribe to NFL SUPER BOWL from most locations other than the UK or Ireland should have access to all games live, although limited blackouts may apply if such users try to watch from the UK or Ireland.

Where is the cheapest location to get NFL SUPER BOWL international Game Pass?

NFL SUPER BOWL prices vary from region to region, but South American locations tend to offer the lowest prices. For information about specific countries, contact ExpressVPN Support.

Subscription refunds are valid up to seven days from the purchase date. Free trial refunds are valid up to three days after the trial ends. More details can be found on the NFL Digital Care site.

Which devices can I watch International NFL Game Pass on? superbowl

NFL Game Pass works on the following devices. To set up ExpressVPN on your device, follow the corresponding link below:

iOS 10+
Android 6.0+
Apple TV
Amazon Fire TV
Android TV

What’s the difference between NFL Game Pass and NFL SUPER BOWL Ticket?

NFL Game Pass is the NFL’s streaming service. It is different from NFL SUPER BOWL Ticket, which is exclusive to AT&T TV Now.

Game Pass comes in two flavours. The domestic Game Pass only shows out-of-market preseason games, regular-season game replays, and the full range of NFL Films. The international Game Pass shows every live regular season and playoff game, including the Super Bowl. Read more about the nuances of NFL Game Pass.

SUPER BOWL Ticket is only available to U.S. with a valid service address. SUPER BOWL Ticket shows out-of-market games only and excludes select international games. In particular, games broadcast by your local Fox or CBS affiliate will not be available for streaming.

How to solve NFL  SUPER BOWL international streaming problems

Don’t let a troublesome connection knock you out of bounds! If you encounter any issues while streaming the NFL, contact ExpressVPN Support for immediate assistance.

Who’s going to win Super Bowl?

The Kansas City Chiefs look primed to defend their crown with an offense that is almost impossible to stop thanks to the trio of Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelce, and Tyreek Hill. The Chiefs’ defense only needs to be respectable for this team to roll over its opponents, and even if it comes down to a shootout they are well equipped to win those games.

In the second tier the Green Bay Packers, Buffalo Bills, New Orleans Saints and Baltimore Ravens. The Saints and Ravens are especially dangerous because they have elite defenses to match their offensive firepower, but each comes with a major blemish. Despite their win over the Titans, it’s clear that the Ravens are a far better team when they have a lead, and it’s hard to see them chasing down an elite team from behind with their limited passing attack. New Orleans has a balanced roster, but Drew Brees is coming off a brutal rib injury and will have to stay healthy.

If you’re interested in a Cinderella story, your best option is the Cleveland Browns, who shocked the Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday for their first win in Pittsburgh in 17 years. The Browns are well-coached and possess a dominant running game that can help them hold and extend leads, even against elite competition. Their defense is far from dominant, and Baker Mayfield has been tough to trust at times, but this club is extremely physical and capable of giving any team a scare.

FiveThirtyEight’s championship probabilities are as follows:
Team Super Bowl Odds
Chiefs 22%
Saints 21%
Bills 19%
Packers 18%
Ravens 7%
Buccaneers 6%
Rams 4%
Browns 2%
The biggest dates of the 2020-21 NFL season
NFL SUPER BOWL 2020/21 season dates

Name Date Location
Regular season September 10, 2020 – January 3, 2021 U.S.

Playoffs Start date: January 9, 2021 U.S.
Super Bowl LV

February 7, 2021 Tampa, Florida

Kansas City Chiefs vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Sunday February 7, 2021
Kickoff – 06:30 PM ET
Watch – CBS, NFL Live on Yahoo Sports, NFL App
Listen – NFL Game Pass, Westwood One, Sirius XM
LOCATION: Raymond James Stadium, Tampa, FL.
Watch Live

Who are you picking to make Super Bowl LV? Leave your thoughts in the comments, and don’t forget to sign up for your VPN!

ExpressVPN is a VPN service not intended to be used as a means of copyright circumvention. Please read the ExpressVPN Terms of Service and your content provider’s Terms of Use for more details.

How To Watch Vancouver Canucks vs Ottawa Senators NHL live streams Reddit Free: Canucks vs Senators Ice Hockey Game TV channel Info Watch Without Any Cable
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Renewable Energy Group, Inc. Investors: Company Investigated by the Portnoy Law Firm



LOS ANGELES, March 03, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Portnoy Law Firm advises Renewable Energy Group, Inc. (“Renewable Energy” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: REGI) investors that the firm has initiated an investigation into possible securities fraud, and may file a class action on behalf of investors.

Investors are encouraged to contact attorney Lesley F. Portnoy, by phone 310-692-8883 or email: [email protected], to discuss their legal rights, or click here to join the case via The Portnoy Law Firm can provide a complimentary case evaluation and discuss investors’ options for pursuing claims to recover their losses.

After the market closed on February 25, 2021, a press release was issued by Renewable Energy announcing the financial results of its fourth quarter and full year 2020. Renewable Energy revealed that it would restate “$38.2 million in cumulative revenue from January 2018 through September 30, 2020” because Renewable Energy was not the “proper claimant for certain BTC [biodiesel mixture excise tax credits] payments on biodiesel it sold between January 1, 2017 and September 30, 2020.” It was further stated by Renewable Energy that it had reached an agreement with the Internal Revenue Service “on a $40.5 million assessment, excluding interest” in order to correct these claims. On February 26, 2021, Renewable Energy’s stock price fell as much as 9% on this news during intraday trading.

Please visit our website to review more information and submit your transaction information.

The Portnoy Law Firm represents investors in pursuing claims arising from corporate wrongdoing. The Firm’s founding partner has recovered over $5.5 billion for aggrieved investors. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.


ONEONTA, Ala., March 03, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Otelco Inc. (Nasdaq: OTEL), (“Otelco” or the “Company”) a wireline telecommunication services provider in Alabama, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, Vermont and West Virginia, announced today that it will release its fourth quarter and 2020 financial and operational results after the close of trading on Tuesday, March 16, 2021. The Company will hold a conference call to discuss these results on Wednesday, March 17, 2021, at 11:30 a.m. (Eastern Time). To listen to the call, participants should dial (856) 344-9206 approximately 10 minutes prior to the start of the call. A telephonic replay will be available from 2:30 p.m. (Eastern Time) on March 17, 2021, through March 26, 2021, by dialing (719) 457-0820 and entering Confirmation Code 2033224.

The live broadcast of Otelco’s quarterly conference call will be available online at on March 17, 2021, beginning at 11:30 a.m. (Eastern Time). The online replay will be available at approximately 2:30 p.m. (Eastern Time) on March 17, 2021, and will continue to be available for 30 days.


On July 27, 2020, Otelco announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by affiliates formed by Oak Hill Capital, a private equity firm. On October 9, 2020, the Company held a virtual special meeting of its stockholders at which the Agreement and Plan of Merger was adopted. Otelco is awaiting regulatory approvals of the proposed merger from the FCC and the public utility commissions in certain states it serves. The transaction is now expected to close in the second quarter of 2021.


Otelco Inc. provides wireline telecommunications services in Alabama, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, Vermont and West Virginia. The Company’s services include local and long distance telephone, digital high-speed data lines, transport services, network access, cable television and other related services. Otelco provides over 64,000 services to more than 32,000 customers, with approximately 27% of those customers capable of receiving gigabit internet speeds over its Lightwave product or DOCSIS 3.1 cable platform. Otelco operates eleven incumbent telephone companies serving rural markets, or rural local exchange carriers. It also provides competitive retail and wholesale communications services and technology consulting, managed services and private/hybrid cloud hosting services through several subsidiaries. For more information, visit the Company’s website at

Statements in this press release that are not statements of historical or current fact constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other unknown factors that could cause the actual results of the Company to be materially different from the historical results or from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition to statements which explicitly describe such risks and uncertainties, readers are urged to consider statements labeled with the terms “believes,” “belief,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “plans,” or similar terms to be uncertain and forward-looking. The forward-looking statements contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties that are described from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

Curtis Garner
Chief Financial Officer
Otelco Inc.
[email protected]




Important Deadline Reminder: Vita Law Offices P.C. Reminds Clover Health Investments, Corp. Investors of Important Deadline in Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit

Continue Reading


Similarly, Kavanaugh also suggested that voting laws that are “commonplace” in states that do not have a history of racist voting restrictions are likely permissible under the Voting Rights Act — reasoning that could save Arizona’s restrictions on out-of-precinct voting. According to Kavanaugh, similar restrictions exist in about two dozen states



Senate Democrats and President Joe Biden settled a last-minute debate over Biden’s $1.9 trillion pandemic relief bill, choosing to keep federal unemployment benefit payments at $400 per week but phase out the measure’s $1,400 stimulus checks more quickly.

The breakthrough comes just a few hours before Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is hoping to kick off debate on the Covid aid bill. One Senate Democratic aide said the chamber is now waiting only on official scores from the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation to confirm its bill doesn’t run afoul of the rules of budget reconciliation, the process that allows passage of the package with a simple majority.

Biden signed off on moderate Democrats’ demand to phase out the checks more quickly, the aide said. The bill’s $1,400 payments will now phase out completely at $80,000 per year for individuals and $160,000 for joint filers; the phase-outs will start at $75,000 and $150,000 respectively. But the bill will retain $400 in extra weekly unemployment payments through August rather than cut them to $300, as suggested by Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).

That breakthrough has Democrats ready to press forward on Biden’s bill as soon as possible. Biden urged the party to “swallow” provisions they don’t like during a virtual lunch meeting on Tuesday, according to one Senate Democrat. Moderate senators could offer their $300 weekly proposal as an amendment later this week, while Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said he plans to force a vote on a $15 hourly minimum wage.

Sen. Joe Manchin questions President Joe Biden’s nominee for Secretary of Defense.
Sen. Joe Manchin questions President Joe Biden’s nominee for Secretary of Defense. | Greg Nash-Pool/Getty Images

The disagreement over unemployment benefits was not a big enough problem to derail, or even delay, the party’s push for quick passage of the $1.9 trillion pandemic relief bill.

Those Democrats said that they expected a relatively smooth process as they race to finish the bill ahead of the March 14 expiration of some boosted unemployment benefits. The Senate is hoping to send its version of the legislation back to the House well before that deadline in order to give states a head start on the logistics of extending those benefits.

Schumer took procedural steps to put the House-passed legislation on the floor, though the Senate will substitute in its own text before it finishes voting. Among the things the Senate will remove from the House bill: the $15 minimum wage increase, as well as several transportation projects, all of which were ruled out by the Senate’s nonpartisan parliamentarian.

U.S. Capitol Police officials said Wednesday they have “obtained intelligence that shows a possible plot to breach the Capitol by an identified militia group on Thursday, March 4” — the date that far-right conspiracy theorists believe former President Donald Trump will return to power.

The intelligence is being taken “seriously,” the officials said in a statement posted on Twitter.

“We have already made significant security upgrades to include establishing a physical structure and increasing manpower to ensure the protection of Congress, the public and our police officers, the statement said. “Our Department is working with our local, state, and federal partners to stop any threats to the Capitol. We are taking the intelligence seriously. Due to the sensitive nature of this information, we cannot provide additional details at this time.”

The statement issued Wednesday morning follows another Tuesday night in which officials said they had beefed up security.

MORE: ‘Many’ US Capitol Police officers want to retire or leave after Jan. 6 insurrection, union says
“The Department is aware of concerning information and intelligence pertaining March 4th and continues to work with all of our law enforcement partners,” the federal law enforcement agency said in that statement. “Based on the intelligence that we have, the Department has taken immediate steps to enhance our security posture and staffing for a number of days, to include March 4th. The Department has communicated our enhanced posture as well as the available intelligence for the entire workforce.”

PHOTO: The United States Capitol Police seal appears on the side of a bus parked near the federal law enforcement agency’s headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 19, 2021.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
The United States Capitol Police seal appears on the side of a bus parked near the federal law enf…Read More
The threats appear to stem from QAnon, the umbrella term for a set of disproven and discredited internet conspiracy theories that allege the world is run by a secret cabal of Satan-worshipping cannibalistic pedophiles. Followers of the fringe movement believe that the 2020 U.S. presidential election was stolen from Trump, who has pushed baseless claims of voter fraud along with his allies. 

QAnon followers also believed that Trump would not actually leave office on Inauguration Day but rather would declare martial law, announce mass arrests of Democrats and stop Joe Biden from becoming president. When that didn’t happen, the date was moved from Jan. 20 to March 4, the original inauguration day for all U.S. presidents prior to 1933.

PHOTO: Members of the National Guard are seen on the east front of the U.S. Capitol building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on March 2, 2021.
Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images
Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images
Members of the National Guard are seen on the east front of the U.S. Capitol building on Capitol…Read More
The Federal Bureau of Investigation first labeled QAnon and its fluid online community of supporters as a “dangerous extremist group” in August 2019. A number of individuals believed to be QAnon followers have been charged for their alleged involvement in the deadly insurrection on Jan. 6, when pro-Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C.

MORE: QAnon emerges as recurring theme of criminal cases tied to US Capitol siege
On Monday, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis issued a confidential assessment to law enforcement agencies, which was obtained by ABC News, saying that the threat of domestic violent extremism in 2020 — largely driven by “violent anti-government or anti-authority narratives, periods of prolonged civil unrest and conspiracy theories” — is a trend that will likely continue in 2021 and “could escalate to include targeting of critical infrastructure.”

Two separate teams of Republican lawyers looked at Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, a case the Supreme Court heard on Tuesday, and saw an opportunity to stick a knife in the Voting Rights Act — potentially eliminating any meaningful safeguards against racist voting laws in the process.

The case involves two Arizona laws that make it harder for some voters to cast a ballot. One law requires election officials to discard ballots that are cast in the wrong precinct. The second prohibits many forms of “ballot collection,” where a voter gives their absentee ballot to another person, who then delivers that ballot to the election office so it can be counted.

Michael Carvin, a lawyer for the Arizona Republican Party, argued in his brief that states have broad power to enact laws restricting the “time, place, or manner” where voters cast their ballots — though he rapidly backpedaled after Justice Elena Kagan suggested that this proposed rule would allow a state to require all voters to cast their ballots at, say, country clubs.

Arizona’s Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich, meanwhile, suggested in his brief that states that wish to disenfranchise voters of color may take advantage of existing demographic disparities to target racial minorities, so long as the state does not create those disparities. As Brnovich argued, the restriction on out-of-precinct voting should be upheld because “the fact that a ballot cast by a voter outside of his or her assigned precinct is discarded does not cause minorities to vote out-of-precinct disproportionately.”

Taken to its logical extreme, this proposed rule could permit truly outlandish attempts to restrict voting. Suppose that Arizona had passed a law limiting the franchise to country music fans, on the theory that white voters are more likely to listen to country music than voters of color. Under Brnovich’s standard, that law might not violate the Voting Rights Act’s protections against race discrimination because the state did not cause non-white voters to prefer other genres of music.

Both Carvin and Brnovich’s briefs, in other words, proposed reading a key prong of the Voting Rights Act so narrowly that it would become virtually meaningless. States would gain a broad power to disenfranchise voters of color, so long as they were somewhat clever about how they did so.

By the end of Tuesday’s arguments in Brnovich, however, it appeared unlikely that these attempts to neutralize the Voting Rights Act will prevail. There may very well be five votes — or even more than five votes — to uphold the two Arizona laws at issue in Brnovich. But several key justices appeared reluctant to go as far as Carvin and Brnovich asked them to go.

Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett — all conservatives — each expressed concerns that Carvin’s proposed test either wasn’t workable or contradicted the text of the Voting Rights Act. After Carvin conceded that a state could not require every ballot to be cast at a country club, Barrett warned him that his argument “has some contradictions in it.”

Brnovich ran into similar trouble when he stepped up to the podium. Roberts, for example, appeared unconvinced that a key prong of Brnovich’s argument could be squared with the text of the Voting Rights Act. Kavanaugh suggested that a state law might violate the Voting Rights Act if it imposes unnecessary burdens on racial minorities. Barrett suggested that Brnovich’s approach would make it too easy for a state to disenfranchise racial minorities, so long as it enacted a series of laws that each disenfranchised a relatively small group of voters.

None of this means that the Arizona laws are likely to be struck down — many of the conservative justices appeared to spend the latter half of the argument trying to devise a legal standard that would allow them to uphold the laws. But the mere fact that they felt it necessary to come up with a new legal standard is a somewhat optimistic sign for voting rights, as it suggests that the Court is not ready to strangle the Voting Rights Act in the way proposed by Carvin’s or Brnovich’s brief.

These Republican lawyers simply asked for too much.

Sign up for The Weeds newsletter
Vox’s German Lopez is here to guide you through the Biden administration’s unprecedented burst of policymaking. Sign up to receive our newsletter each Friday.

The Voting Rights Act, briefly explained
Enacted in 1965, the Voting Rights Act is one of the most important civil rights laws in American history. It dismantled, at least for a while, many of the tools that Jim Crow lawmakers used to disenfranchise Black voters, and began a half-century long experiment in pluralistic democracy.

On the day that the Voting Rights Act was signed, only about 5 percent of the Black people of voting age in Mississippi were registered to vote. Two years later, that number was 60 percent.

Broadly speaking, the Voting Rights Act provides three safeguards against racist state and local voting laws. Section 5 of the law required state and local governments with a history of enacting such laws to “preclear” any new election rules with officials in Washington, DC, before those rules could take effect. Section 2 of the law, meanwhile, provides two separate protections against discriminations — known as the “intent test” and the “results test.”

If a voting rights plaintiff can show that an election law was enacted for the purpose of making it harder for voters of a particular race to cast their ballot, then the law violates Section 2’s “intent test.”

Under a 1982 amendment to the Voting Rights Act, state and local governments also may not enact a law that “results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color” — and this “results test” applies even if the lawmakers who enacted an allegedly racist law did not do so with any racial animus.

Under Chief Justice Roberts’s leadership, however, the Supreme Court has largely dismantled the first two prongs of the Voting Rights Act.

In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the Supreme Court effectively deactivated Section 5’s preclearance requirement by striking down the formula that the Act used to determine which jurisdictions are subject to preclearance. Then, in Abbott v. Perez (2018), the Court held that lawmakers enjoy such a strong presumption of racial innocence that voting rights plaintiffs will struggle to prove racist intent in all but the most egregious cases.

Brnovich primarily concerns whether the two challenged Arizona laws violate the Voting Rights Act’s results test, which prohibits at least some laws that have a disproportionate impact on racial minorities. Given the Court’s decisions in Shelby County and Perez, many Supreme Court observers (including myself) feared that the Court’s conservative majority would use Brnovich to gut the results test in much the same way that the Court previously hobbled preclearance and the intent test.

That may very well still happen, but the oral argument in Brnovich suggests that annihilation of the results test will probably have to wait until another case comes along. While many of the justices signaled that they are inclined to uphold Arizona’s laws, the justices seemed unwilling to go quite as far as lawyers like Carvin and Brnovich hoped.

So what happens now?
Carvin’s brief took the bold position that “race-neutral regulations of the where, when, and how of voting do not implicate § 2” — though the brief does suggest at some points that only “ordinary” restrictions on “the time, place, or manner of voting” are permissible. But several justices appeared to view this proposed test as unworkable.

Kagan, for example, spent her questioning time with Carvin peppering him with questions about hypothetical voting restrictions — such as whether a state could require everyone to vote at a country club with a history of racist policies, or whether a state could require everyone to vote between 10 am and 2 pm on a particular day. And Carvin quickly started backtracking from the position he took in his brief when confronted with Kagan’s hypotheticals.

Even Carvin appeared to realize that it would be untenable to require every voter to cast their ballot at a country club.

Kavanaugh, meanwhile, homed in on Carvin’s suggestion that only “ordinary” voting restrictions may be allowed — wondering how a judge is supposed to distinguish an “ordinary” restriction from an “extraordinary” one.

Brnovich received a somewhat less chilly reception from the justices than Carvin did, but he still faced a barrage of skeptical questions. A key prong of Brnovich’s argument, for example, is that a plaintiff can only prevail under the results test if they can show that a challenged law “causes a substantial disparity in minority voters’ opportunity to vote and to elect their preferred candidates.” But that argument prompted Roberts to wonder where Brnovich is able to find this “substantial disparity” requirement in the Voting Rights Act’s text.

By the time Jessica Ring Amunson and Bruce Spiva, two of the lawyers challenging Arizona’s election laws, began their arguments, the Court’s conservatives appeared more interested in coming up with a new framework that would allow them to uphold Arizona’s laws, then they were in applying the scorched-earth frameworks proposed by Carvin and Brnovich.

Several justices repeatedly brought up the 2005 Carter-Baker Commission Report, a report produced by a commission chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker, which, as Roberts noted, suggested that states should have some safeguards against fraud in “ballot harvesting.” Ballot harvesting is a pejorative term for a practice in which absentee voters give their ballots to a third party, who delivers that ballot to a polling place.

According to Kavanaugh, it is “a matter of common sense” that a voting restriction supported by such a commission probably isn’t a racist attempt to restrict minority voting.

Similarly, Kavanaugh also suggested that voting laws that are “commonplace” in states that do not have a history of racist voting restrictions are likely permissible under the Voting Rights Act — reasoning that could save Arizona’s restrictions on out-of-precinct voting. According to Kavanaugh, similar restrictions exist in about two dozen states.

The bottom line is that there’s a good chance that Arizona’s restrictions on ballot collection and out-of-precinct voting will be upheld. And there’s even a good chance that the Court will take a significant bite out of the Voting Rights Act in Brnovich.

But going by today’s arguments, at least, the full-scale attack on the Act proposed by Carvin and Brnovich seems less likely. Such an attack may still come in a future case, but Carvin and Brnovich’s ham-handed lawyering left the justices little to work with if they hope to dismantle the results test right now.

Senate Democrats need all 50 of their members to kick off consideration of the bill, a vote expected on Wednesday afternoon. After that the chamber will plunge into a long debate and finish with a series of amendment votes that could run for hours on end, known as a “vote-a-rama.”

Senate Republicans are debating how painful to make things for Democrats, possibly by dragging out the marathon of unlimited amendments overnight. That would likely happen late on Thursday and run into early Friday morning.

“I’m hoping for infinity. There are people talking about trying to set up a schedule and having it go on and on,” said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

Paul said some in his party want to push the debate well past Thursday and keep adding amendments into Friday, while he has suggested to Schumer to spread the pain over two days.

Continue Reading


Hernia Repair Devices and Consumables Global Market to 2028 – Increased Strategic Collaborations Among Robotic Surgical



The “Global Hernia Repair Devices and Consumables Market 2021-2028″ report has been added to’s offering.

According to this report, the global market for hernia repair devices and consumables market is assessed to exhibit growth at a CAGR of 3.80% during the calculated years of 2021-2028.

The global market’s progress can be attributed to the rising acceptance of tension-free repair procedures, along with the growing occurrence of hernias. Additionally, the surge in strategic collaborations among robotic surgical equipment manufacturers is opening several new opportunities for the hernia repair devices and consumables market over the predicted period.

However, the inadequate reimbursement policies and high cost of hernia repair surgeries are factors that are significantly limiting the expansion of the hernia repair devices and consumables market’s progress globally.


The global market includes the Asia-Pacific, North America, Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East and Africa regions.

Globally, North America holds the largest market for hernia repair devices and consumables, and is likely to continue dominating the market till 2028. The region’s robust growth is primarily owing to the high occurrence of hernia diseases, improved healthcare facilities, government initiatives, and rising awareness relating to hernia surgeries.

Furthermore, inguinal hernia repair is among the most common surgeries across the United States. Moreover, this condition is considered to account for 75% of all abdominal wall hernias, which significantly influences the demand for hernia repair devices and consumables. Hence, these factors are likely to augment the growth of the hernia repair devices and consumables market in North America.


The key establishments in the hernia repair devices and consumables market consist of The Cooper Companies Inc, Zimmer Biomet Inc, CR Bard Inc, Herniamesh SRL, Cook Medical Inc, B Braun Melsungen AG, Integra Lifesciences Corporation, Cryolife Inc, Via Surgical Ltd, Johnson and Johnson (Ethicon Inc), WL Gore & Associates, Allergan Plc, and Medtronic Plc.

Johnson and Johnson is involved in developing, manufacturing, and marketing a wide range of products in the healthcare industry. Moreover, the company offers services to several end-users, including pharmaceuticals and consumers, among others. Ethicon Inc functions as a Johnson and Johnson subsidiary, primarily engaged in providing hernia repair and fixation products, including hernia mesh, hernia biologic mesh, hernia tissue separation mesh, and hernia flat mesh devices. The company has operations across more than 250 countries, with headquarters located in the United States.

Key Topics Covered:

1. Global Hernia Repair Devices and Consumables Market – Summary

2. Industry Outlook
2.1. Porter’s Five Forces Model
2.1.1. Threat of New Entrants
2.1.2. Threat of Substitute Products
2.1.3. Bargaining Power of Buyers
2.1.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
2.1.5. Competitive Rivalry
2.2. Impact of Covid-19 on Hernia Repair Devices and Consumables Market
2.3. Legal, Policy, & Regulatory Framework
2.4. Market Attractiveness Index
2.5. Key Insights
2.6. Market Drivers
2.6.1. Rising Acceptance of Tension-Free Repair Procedures
2.6.2. Increasing Prevalence of Hernia
2.7. Market Restraints
2.7.1. Inadequate Reimbursement Policies
2.7.2. High Cost of Hernia Repair Surgeries
2.8. Market Opportunities
2.8.1. Increased Strategic Collaborations Among Robotic Surgical Equipment Manufacturers
2.8.2. Opportunities for Market Development in Emerging Countries

3. Global Hernia Repair Devices and Consumables Market – by Hernia Type
3.1. Inguinal Hernia
3.2. Incisional Hernia
3.3. Umbilical Hernia
3.4. Femoral Hernia
3.5. Other Hernia

4. Global Hernia Repair Devices and Consumables Market – by Surgery Type
4.1. Open Tension-Free Repair Surgery
4.2. Laparoscopic Surgery

5. Global Hernia Repair Devices and Consumables Market – by Component
5.1. Consumables
5.1.1. Synthetic Material Mesh Absorbable Mesh Non-Absorbable Mesh
5.1.2. Biological Material Mesh
5.2. Fixation Devices
5.2.1. Tack Absorbable Tack Non-Absorbable Tack
5.2.2. Other Fixation Devices

6. Global Hernia Repair Devices and Consumables Market – Regional Outlook
6.1. North America
6.2. Europe
6.3. Asia-Pacific
6.4. Latin America
6.5. Middle East and Africa

7. Company Profiles
7.1. Cook Medical Inc
7.2. The Cooper Companies Inc
7.3. B Braun Melsungen AG
7.4. Johnson and Johnson (Ethicon Inc)
7.5. CR Bard Inc
7.6. Via Surgical Ltd
7.7. Medtronic plc
7.8. Cryolife Inc
7.9. Herniamesh Srl
7.10. Allergan plc
7.11. Integra Lifesciences Corporation
7.12. Zimmer Biomet Inc
7.13. WL Gore & Associates
7.14. Baxter International Inc

8. Research Methodology & Scope
8.1. Research Scope & Deliverables
8.1.1. Objectives of Study
8.1.2. Scope of Study
8.2. Sources of Data
8.2.1. Primary Data Sources
8.2.2. Secondary Data Sources
8.3. Research Methodology
8.3.1. Evaluation of Proposed Market
8.3.2. Identification of Data Sources
8.3.3. Assessment of Market Determinants
8.3.4. Data Collection
8.3.5. Data Validation & Analysis

Laura Wood, Senior Press Manager
[email protected]
For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470
For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630
For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

Continue Reading


Recent Posts